Md. Chand v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35706 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2022 Thana- SABAUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== MD. CHAND SON OF MD. GHOKUA @ GHOKUA @ MD. IZHAR @ MD. IJHAR R/O VILLAGE- SAFIYARI, P.S.- SABOUR, DISTRICTBHAGALPUR. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Najmul Hodda For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-09-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sabour P.S. Case 24/2022, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, accusation against the petitioner is that he stabbed on his stomach and injured the informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case due to local village politics. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.01.2022 and bears criminal antecedent of two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35706 of 2022(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2 cases in which he is on bail. The informant and petitioner are residing in the same locality and due to some business dispute between the occurrence took place. He further submits that as per medical report, doctor has found that the injury of the informant is simple in nature caused by sharp object. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. He further submits that allegation against the petitioner has supported by the injury report.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there is specific allegation against the petitioner and the same has supported by the injury report and material available on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, if trial is not concluded within six months from the date of receipt / production of copy of this order, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the learned trial court itself.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T