Manmatiya Devi @ Manamati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35894 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-74 Year-2021 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

Manmatiya Devi @ Manamati Devi Wife Of Late Buti Manjhi @ Jalendra Manjhi R/O Village- Chomadi, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya 2.

Sarita Devi @ Srita Devi Wife Of Raju Manjhi R/O Village- Chomadi, P.S.- Konch, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No2 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 28-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 149, 353, 341, 323, 504 and 509 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation is that petitioners and other co-accused persons have obstructed the police personnel in discharging official duties and also assaulted by means of Lathi to them. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35894 of 2022(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that in the present case no injury has been received by any of them as in the entire First Information Report there is no discussion about the injury received by Police personnel. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 74 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T