Mahesh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34741 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2024 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria ====================================================== Mahesh Paswan S/O Vishundeo Paswan @ Vishunudeo Paswan Resident of Village- Temtha Karari, P.S.- Parbatta, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhim Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 10-06-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Parbatta P.S.Case no. 215 of 2024 registered under sections 376(2)(g), 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that while she was at home the petitioner along with two others committed rape on her.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The trial has commenced and the informant has not supported the prosecution case as alleged in the FIR. The petitioner is in custody since 13.10.2024 and undertakes to cooperate in the trial.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34741 of 2025(2) dt.10-06-2025 2/2
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State who submits that the victim informant has supported the prosecution case in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioner in the F.I.R., together with the contents of the statement of the informant recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. as brought on record as Annexure-P/2 to the petition wherein she has supported the prosecution case and the trial having commenced, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application for bail is rejected.
7. The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U T