Md Javed @ Niyaj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42353 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2023 Thana- UJIYARPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== Md Javed @ Niyaj Son of Md Kamar Village- Kasbe Ahar, Ps- Tajpur, distSamastipur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Hussamuddin Azad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Ujiarpur P.S. Case No. 60 of 2023 for the offence punishable under sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code lodged on 01.03.2023 by the informant, Surendra Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while conducting business in the branch/doing routine work, around 10:30 AM, criminals barged into the bank and looted Rs. 9,45,520/-. This led to the FIR.
4. Subsequently, the investigation took place, the petitioner came into the net and as per the learned Sessions Judge's order, recovery of amount has also been made from this petitioner.
5. Further, the case diary has recorded the pictures of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42353 of 2025(4) dt.01-08-2025 2/2 CCTV camera where the petitioner has been found to be part of the Bank dacoity.
6. Though learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court about his innocence, learned APP submits that a bare perusal of the paragraph 3 would show that he is involved in such cases and the list is endless.
7. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the allegation that has come against him, as found recorded in the case diary and the learned Sessions Judge's order, he has more than half a dozen criminal antecedent, in that background, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of bail which is accordingly rejected.
8. In view of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 15.05.2023, it is expected from the Trial Court that the trial will be taken to its logical conclusion at an earliest. (Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U