← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11981/2016dismissed

Krishna Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-12-05Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11981 of 2016 =========================================================== Krishna Kumar Singh S/o Late Triguna Singh R./o Naika Loha Tola, P.O.+P.S.- Rivilganj, District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Joint Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Back Harding Road, House no 17 Near Chitkohara Bridge, Patna through the Secretary.

4. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Back Harding Road, House No 17 , Near Chitkohara Bridge Patna.

5. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Back Harding Road, House no 17, Near Chitkohara Bridge, Patna.

6. Prabhu Narayan Mishra, S/o Kashi Nath Mishra, R/o Village Godna, Brahmin Toli, P.O.- Rivilganj, District Saran.

.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Ranjan For the Respondent/s : Mr. GA10- SMT.NIVEDITA NIRVIKAR For B.S.S.B : Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-12-2016 The only reason why the Court is not willing to drag the matter any further and allow the petitioner any leeway while challenging the impugned order contained in Annexure-22, dated 27.05.2016, passed by the Joint Director, Secondary Education, Government of Bihar is that the petitioner admittedly was the former Secretary of the Managing Committee. He is no longer part of the establishment in any manner. Therefore, the Court would not appreciate his continued emotionality with regard to the decisions taken during his regime.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11981 of 2016 dt.05-12-2016 2 / 2

2. In the opinion of the Court, if the present dispensation and Committee is interested in maintaining the previous decisions, they will surely defend their interest and rights otherwise change is inevitable in every situation.

3. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) S.Kumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.12.2016 Transmission Date NA