← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38238/2024bail granted

Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-03Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38238 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Buxar ====================================================== Nitish Kumar Son of Late Rajendra Yadav @ Rajendra Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Farhada, Police Station - Barhara, District - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sneha Raj Daughter of Ram Samujh Singh Resident of Village - Atimee, Police Station - Nawanagar, District - Buxar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Viveka Nandsingh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, being husband, has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the O.P. No. 2. It is next submitted that presently the relationship in between the petitioner and the O.P. No. 2 has soured to an extent where it is not possible to revive the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38238 of 2024(4) dt.03-09-2024 2/3 conjugal relationship, but then it is fairly submitted that with passage of time and on intervention of well wishers, the parties may resolve their dispute. It is also submitted that petitioner, being husband, is aware of his responsibility towards the O.P. No. 2 and the child who presently is staying with her and thus the learned counsel, based on instruction, submits that petitioner is willing to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs.7,500/- to the O.P. No. 2 and the child.

4. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No. 2 submits that since petitioner is willing to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. 7,500/- to the O.P. No. 2 and the child, as such, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to jail.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No. 2 further submits that he will Whatsapp the bank account number of the O.P. No. 2 on the Whatsapp number of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner undertakes to communicate the same to the petitioner so that the monthly maintenance, as agreed, commences from 23.09.2024.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38238 of 2024(4) dt.03-09-2024 3/3 event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Buxar (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 04 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. However, it is made clear that the O.P. No. 2 shall be at liberty to file an application before this Court seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in the event if the petitioner does not deposit/give the amount of monthly maintenance, as agreed, for two consecutive months.

8. It is further made clear that the present maintenance will stop in the event if the maintenance is decided by a Court of competent jurisdiction.

Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application is allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T