Bipul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34043 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-411 Year-2024 Thana- PAROO District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Bipul Kumar S/o Rajendra Sah R/o Village- Mohjamma, PS- Paroo, DistrictMuzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Choubey Jawahar For the Informant :

Dr. Bipin Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Paroo P.S Case No. 411/2024 dated 10.11.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 103(1) read with Section 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons in connivance with the others shot the informant's son and her grand son dead and threw their dead bodies.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34043 of 2025(4) dt.07-11-2025 2/2 this case. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this court vide order dated 12.08.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35672/2025. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that it is a case of double murder. As per para. 26, 27 and 56 of the case diary, it is mentioned that the petitioner and the co-accused persons took Raju and Suraj with them and then killed them.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the heinous nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am of the view that no case for grant of anticipatory bail is made out. The petition is rejected and the petitioner is directed to surrender to the Court below within six weeks from the date of this order and the Court below may consider the prayer of the bail of the petitioner in accordance with law and on its own merits without being prejudice by this order.

7. This application stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T