Md. Sagiruddin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13197 of 2016 ====================================================== Md. Sagiruddin, Son of Late Ekbal Hussain, Resident of Kagji Muhalal, Distt.- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary.

2. The Vice Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra.

3. The Registrar, Jai Prakash University Chapra.

4. The Director, Higher Education Bihar Patna.

5. The Principal, Vidya Bhawan Mahila College, Siwan.

6. Smt. Chanda Kumari, the then Incharge Principal, Vidya Bhawan Mahila College , Siwan.

7. Smt. Rewa Chakrawarty, the then Reader, Vidya Bhawan Mahila College Siwan.

8. Dr. Sobha Sinha, the then Reader, Vidya Bhawan Mahila College, Siwan.

9. The Principal , P.R. College Sonpur.

10. Dr. Braj Bhusahn Singh, Head of the Department of Zoology, P.R. College Sonpur.

11. Dr. Balendra Prasad Sinha, Head of Department of Philosophy , P.R. College, Sonpur.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Ms. Madhuri Lata, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr. Sunil Kumar, A.C. to G.A.-12 For the University : Mr. Hansraj, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-09-2016 Heard Ms. Madhuri Lata, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned A.C. to G.A.-12. Heard also Mr. Hansraj, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondent-University.

With the help of this writ petition, made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the form of Public Interest

Patna High Court CWJC No.13197 of 2016 (2) dt.20-09-2016 2/2 Litigation, the petitioner has made allegations of corruption prevailing in Vidya Bhawan Mahila College, Siwan and in P.R. College, Sonepur, District-Saran, The writ application, however, does not have any substantive supporting material.

In view of the above, no direction, at this stage, can be issued to the respondents by invoking this Court's extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. We are, therefore, closing this writ petition. It is made clear that the petitioner, if so advised, may either lodge a First Information Report with jurisdictional Police Station or a complaint with the Criminal Court of competent jurisdiction if he has materials to support the allegations of defalcation or misappropriation of public fund. If a First Information Report is lodged or a complaint is filed, the same shall be dealt with, expeditiously, in accordance with law.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U