Pankaj Das @ Pankaj Kumar Das @ Sawan @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32891 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2019 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== Pankaj Das @ Pankaj Kumar Das @ Sawan @ Pankaj Kumar, Son of Late Suren Das @ Suresh Das, Resident of Village- Gokul Singh Thakurbari, Shankar Chouk, P.S.- K.Hat, Dist.- Purnia.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with K. Hat (Maranga) P.S. Case No. 55 of 2019, registered under Sections 341 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea.

The accusation is that Shubham Kumar Choudahry, son of the informant, was playing Badminton along with his friend in the evening of 24.01.2009. At that time, four persons named in the F.I.R. including the petitioner reached there, boarding on two motorcycles, and made indiscriminate firing, in which, his son, Shubham Kumar Choudhary sustained injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32891 of 2019(2) dt.20-05-2019 2/2 and thereafter, all fled away.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while the petitioner and three others named in the F.I.R. with general allegation of making firing at Shubham Kumar Choudhary but only two bullet injuries were found on the person of the son of the informant.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T