Ram Nath Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45120 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2021 Thana- BENIPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== RAM NATH YADAV Son of Ram Chandra Yadav Resident of village - Najara, P.S. Benipatti, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within four weeks after complete start of the physical Court. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Submission is that recovery of liquor is alleged from outside the house. The place of recovery is accessible by anyone. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Considering lack of direct material against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45120 of 2021(2) dt.21-12-2021 2/2 released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Benipatti Police Station Case No. 86 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T