Pankaj Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3515 of 2018 ====================================================== Pankaj Kumar Sharma, son of Jai Kumar Sharma, Resident of Village Gandhi Path, Ward No. 21, P.S. Saharsa, District - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The District Magistrate, District - Purnea.
3.
The Superintendent of Excise, Purnea, District - Purnea. 4.
The S.I. of Baisi police station of District Purnea. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Nadimul Hasan, Adv.
For the Respondents :
Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha -GA-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 21-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents.
The petitioner prays for setting aside the order dated 16.05.2017 passed by the District Magistrate, Purnea in Excise Case No. 282 of 2016 whereby vehicle, namely, Scorpio bearing Registration No. BR 19F 8847 has been confiscated and further direction to the respondents to release the vehicle seized in connection with Baisi P. S. Case No. 161 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
Learned counsel for the petitioner invites our attention to the order dated 18th January, 2020 passed in CWJC No. 3245 of 2017 titled as Manish Kumar Chaudhary Vs. The State of
Patna High Court CWJC No. 3515 of 2018(3) dt.21-01-2020 2/2 Bihar & Ors. and prays for disposal in terms thereof. As such, as prayed for, on mutually agreed terms, we dispose of the present petition in terms of the order dated 18th January, 2020 passed in CWJC No. 3245 of 2017 titled as Manish Kumar Chaudhary Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. making the terms contained therein, applicable mutatis mutandis, insofar as applicable, also to the instant petition. The terms of the said order shall be deemed to have been incorporated and read as a part and parcel of the present order. It shall be obligatory on the part of the instant parties to place on record of the authorities under the provision of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, a copy of not only the order passed in the instant petition, but also that of CWJC No. 3245 of 2017 titled as Manish Kumar Chaudhary Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. which can be conveniently downloaded from the internet.
No order as to costs.
Petition stands disposed off in the aforesaid terms. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Rajeev Kumar/- U