Md Tnveer @ Md Tanwir v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35923 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2019 Thana- KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- Katihar ====================================================== 1.

Md Tnveer @ Md Tanwir S/O Md. Mustakim Resident Of VillagePaharteli, P.S.- Mufasil, District- Katihar. 2.

Bibi Nalyia @ Bibi Malia @ Maitun Nissa W/O Md. Mustakim Resident Of Village- Paharteli, P.S.- Mufasil, District- Katihar. 3.

Sk. Bholu S/O Md. Mustakim Resident Of Village- Paharteli, P.S.- Mufasil, District- Katihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Syed Qaisar Hasan, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 498(A)/304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners is that one Md. Salauddin was married to the daughter of the informant, and after two years of marriage he started demanding for dowry. When the informant failed to do so, the daughter of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35923 of 2022(5) dt.19-12-2022 2/2 informant was beaten and ousted from the house. It is further alleged that Md. Salauddin alongwith his family members murdered the daughter of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner no. 1 is the dewar of the deceased and petitioner no. 2 is the mother-in-law of the deceased. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that there is general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners.

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail application as petitioner no. 2 has one criminal antecedent and there is specific overt act against the petitioners.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of petitioners is hereby rejected.

This application is accordingly, dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Shahnawaz/- U T