Sintu Yadav @ Bikash Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33259 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2018 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== SINTU YADAV @ BIKASH YADAV, aged about 23 years, Male, Son of Sri Rambaran Yadav @ Ram Varan Yadav Resident of Village- Baluachak, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Aslam Ansari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 27-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 215/2018 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur.

As per F.I.R. it alleged that the petitioner along with others entered into the courtyard of the informant came with iron rod and Bhala and assaulted the informant for which the informant sustained injury. The petitioner assaulted the informant on his head by means of iron rod, and the injury report shows eight injuries have been caused by hard and blunt

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33259 of 2019(3) dt.27-09-2019 2/2 substance.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case as there is land dispute between the parties. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case whereunder the allegation against the petitioner is that he had entered with the iron rod in his hand and had assaulted the informant on his head and the injury report shows eight injuries caused by hard and blunt substance, this court is not willing to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused. In case, the petitioner surrenders in the court below and prays for regular bail within a period of four weeks from today, his prayer for regular bail shall be considered on it's own merit.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Rajeev/- U T