Keera Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2920 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -105 Year- 2017 Thana -KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Keera Rai Son of Sukhdeo Rai, R/o Village- Bangri, P.S.- Kanti, DistrictMuzaffarpur. .... .... Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Hari Mohan Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sri Murlidhar. SPP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by the learned 10th Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, S.C./S.T.(POA) Act, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kanti Police Station Case No.105 of 2017 registered under Sections 323,341,307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act as well as Section 3(i) (R) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act and later on Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has been added.
The allegation of firing at the son of the informant is against co-accused Shambhu Rai and Birendra Rai, which
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2920 of 2017 (6) dt.19-12-2017 caused injury to the son of the informant. On alarm, the appellant and others started firing.
Learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the appellant is accused in six criminal cases.
Since the appellant has suppressed the aforesaid fact in para-3 of the bail petition by deliberately giving wrong statement before this Court, I am not inclined to grant bail to the appellant. Prayer is refused.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.
Let the Registrar General conduct a preliminary enquiry about the conduct of the appellant and the deponent in suppressing the fact regarding the criminal antecedent of the appellant and thereafter take appropriate step for lodging of a complaint case, if needed.
(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- U T