Aman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36132 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2022 Thana- DHARHARA District- Munger ====================================================== Aman Kumar Son Of Ganesh Mahto @ Suresh Mahto Resident Of VillageHemzapur Chand Tola, P.S.- Dharhara, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akbar Ali, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a young boy aged about 19 years with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his minor daughter was kidnapped by the petitioner, Gaurav and Prince. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the victim was in love with Prince and had eloped but falsely implicated the petitioner under parental pressure in her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., it is further submitted that the victim though has supported the prosecution case but in a very prudent manner has made her statement in which she has not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36132 of 2022(2) dt.29-11-2022 2/2 stated anything against the petitioner of committing any abuse or assault. Learned counsel submits that petitioner is a student and is a young boy aged about 19 years and perhaps in friendship he helped Prince and came to be implicated, it is next submitted that in the event, if the petitioner is sent to jail, his entire career would be jeopardized and chances are bright that he may come in contact with hardened criminals Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dharhara P.S. Case No. 36 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. with a further condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be his father Ganesh Mahto @ Suresh Mahto.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T