Tun Tun Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33976 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-259 Year-2020 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== TUN TUN MAHTO S/o Mukesh Mahto Resident of Village-Chhatarpura Bind Toli, P.S-Mokama, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Raj Kumar Sinha,Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 03-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed an undertaking to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.
2. The petitioner is in custody since 18.07.2020 in connection with Barauni (Chakeya) P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020 for the alleged offences under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of 40 litres of Mahua liquor. It is stated that the petitioner has no concern with the offending goods, which was not recovered from his conscious possession. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.
4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.
5. Be that as it may and having regard to the period of custody already suffered since 18.07.2020. let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33976 of 2020(3) dt.03-02-2021 2/2 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cumSpecial Judge, Excise Act, Begusarai in connection with Barauni (Chakeya) P.S. Case No. 259 of 2020, if he is not otherwise required in any other case.
6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
Chandran/- (Vikash Jain, J) U T