← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./36257/2023allowed

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-18Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36257 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-450 Year-2022 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

VIJAY KUMAR @ VIJAY KUMAR SINGH Son of Jay Narayan Singh Resident of Village- Bariyarpur, PS and District- Sitamarhi 2.

Sangeeta Kumari Wife of Vijay Kumar @ vijay Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Bariyarpur, PS and District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-07-2023 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 328, 498A, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioners is that they along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and also administered poisonous substance to her.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36257 of 2023(2) dt.18-07-2023 2/2 nature. Petitioners are the brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the informant and there is no specific overt act against them. He submits that the petitioners are living separately with the informant and they have no concern with either informant or her husband. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Sitamarhi P.S. Case No.450 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The petitioners are directed to not interfere into the peaceful life of the informant.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T