Shiv Kishore Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34899 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-893 Year-2024 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Shiv Kishore Kumar son of Shiv Ballabh Mistry Resident of Village -Kurthaul ( Khairatali), Near Surya Temple Po- Mittanchak, PS- Parsa Bazar District- Patna 2.
Shiv Ballabh Mistry son of Late Shivsaran Mistry Resident of Village -Kurthaul ( Khairatali), Near Surya Temple Po- Mittanchak, PS- Parsa Bazar District- Patna 3.
Shyampari Devi Wife of Shiv Ballabh Mistry Resident of Village -Kurthaul ( Khairatali), Near Surya Temple Po- Mittanchak, PS- Parsa Bazar DistrictPatna 4.
Sameer Kumar son of Shiv Ballabh Mistry Resident of Village -Kurthaul ( Khairatali), Near Surya Temple Po- Mittanchak, PS- Parsa Bazar DistrictPatna 5.
Pankaj Sharma @ Pankaj Kumar son of Raja Ram Mistry village- Gopi Bigha, Po- Kendui, Ps- Magadh Medical, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Sulekha Kumari Daughter of Mahendra Prasad village- west Lohanipur Upadhyay Lane, Po and Ps- Kadamkuan, Dist- Patna ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Sumit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party-State:
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP For Opposite Party no.2:
Mr. S.K.Lal, Senior Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as well as learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No.2.
2. The petitioner is seeking quashing of the First Information Report bearing Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 893 of 2024, dated 24.11.2024, registered for the offences under Sections 493 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34899 of 2025(2) dt.21-04-2026 2/2
3. At the outset, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party No. 2 raised a preliminary objection that now the investigation has concluded and charge-sheet has been filed, followed by the order taking cognizance, therefore, at this stage, the prayer with respect to quashing of the FIR would not be maintainable/entertainable.
4. In view of the fact that the stage has considerably changed, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the matter for the present.
5. This application is accordingly dismissed. (Praveen Kumar, J) Pawan/- U T