Vikram Singh @ Vikram Babu @ Vikram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46182 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Vikram Singh @ Vikram Babu @ Vikram S/O Uday Pratap Singh Resident Of Jay Shree Bhawan, 4th Floor, Jharadih, P.S.- Dhanbad, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ram Shankar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms.Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2024 1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 36 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506 498A and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of D.P Act.
3.
The learned APP submits that the offence for which the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of less than seven years, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.
4.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that investigation in the case is still pending against the petitioner, on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46182 of 2024(2) dt.28-06-2024 2/2 which the learned APP submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).
5.
In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar). 6.
The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case, within a period of three weeks from today, with a web copy of the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the state of Bihar); and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the order dated 132-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).
7.
The defect, as pointed out, is hereby ignored. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T