Patna High CourtCWJC/14067/2016dismissed

The Union Of India And ORS v. Ram Niwas

2017-03-17Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14067 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. The Union Of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway, Hajipur, District- Vaishali (Bihar).

2. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur.

3. The Divisional Railway Manager [P], East Central Railway, Danapur.

4. The Senior Divisional Engineer (Co-ordination), East Central Railway, Danapur.

5. The Senior Division Financial Manager, East Central Railway, Danapur.

6. The Senior Section Engineer [works], East Central Railway, Danapur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

Ram Niwas, son of Late Sheo Pujan, Ex. Carpenter under Senior Section Engineer [Works], East Central Railway, Buxar, Resident of Village/ Post - Ahirauli, District - Buxar [Bihar] .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, Advocate Mr. Manish Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s : None =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 17-03-2017 A batch of writ applications moved against the similar orders, which is under challenge even in this writ application, stands dismissed by a Division Bench on 18.08.2015. Filing of such writ applications, when the question of law stands settled right uptill Hon'ble Supreme Court, has been deprecated by Division Bench and the writ applications dismissed.

The same fate awaits the present writ application as well in view of the settled law. With regard to benefit, which is required to be given to casual employees turned into temporary

Patna High Court CWJC No.14067 of 2016 dt.17-03-2017 2/2 service stands well settled, therefore, the O.A. was allowed by the Tribunal on 16.08.2015 only to maintain consistency of judicial orders and directions.

In view of the same, no interference is warranted with the order of the Tribunal dated 16.08.2015 passed in O.A. No. 558 of 2012.

Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 20.03.2017 Transmission Date NA