← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38855/2024bail granted

Karu Choudhary @ Roushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-30Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38855 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2024 Thana- NARDIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== KARU CHOUDHARY @ ROUSHAN KUMAR SON OF DEVKI CHOUDHARY MUKHIYA @ RANJEET CHAUDHARY Resident of Village - Ichua Karna, P.S. - Nardiganj, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Asha Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 20 litres of liquor along with 200 litres of jaggery solution from a place near the bank of a river.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large. It is further submitted that petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38855 of 2024(2) dt.30-08-2024 2/2 came to be implicated at the instance of the Chawkidar with whom he is on an inimical term. It is next submitted that the police implicate mechanically at the instance of the Chawkidar, local persons, confessional statement and secret information without holding proper investigation of the case.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nardiganj P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. However, the learned trial court, before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner, shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case in that event the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T