Nishar Ansari @ Nisar Mian v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42757 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2024 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.
Nishar Ansari @ Nisar Mian, Son of Dhobi Mian R/O Vill.- Dangarba, Chhotikar, P.S.- Khaira, Dist.- Jamui 2.
Md. Tajmul Ansari, S/O Nishar Ansari R/O Vill.- Dangarba, Chhotikar, P.S.- Khaira, Dist.- Jamui 3.
Talim Ansari, Son of Nishar Ansari, R/O Vill.- Dangarba, Chhotikar, P.S.- Khaira, Dist.- Jamui 4.
Aajmul Ansari, Son of Nishar Ansari, R/O Vill.- Dangarba, Chhotikar, P.S.- Khaira, Dist.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 87 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 325, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that due to land dispute they have assaulted the informant with lathi causing injuries to him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 is full brothers of the informant and petitioner no. 2 to 4 are sons of petitioner no. 1 and there is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42757 of 2024(2) dt.10-07-2024 2/2 land dispute between the parties. There is general and omnibus allegations levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioner no. 1 has also lodged the complaint case against the informant and others after receiving injury in altercation between the parties. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent and they undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial of this case.
5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 87 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T