Guddu Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34838 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2025 Thana- MESKAUR District- Nawada ====================================================== Guddu Chauhan, S/O Raghu Chauhan, Resident Of Village - Mahrajban, P.SMeskaur, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 21-07-2026 From perusal of record, I find that the counter affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party no.2 is on record. But, in the present case, no person has been impleaded as opposite party no.2. It seems office has committed a mistake in annexing the counter affidavit of another case in the present case.
2. Office is directed to verify and annex the counter affidavit with the correct case record.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
4. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Meskaur P.S. Case No. 228 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 127(2), 115(2), 64, 62, 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S.
5. As per prosecution case, allegation against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34838 of 2026(5) dt.21-07-2026 2/3 petitioner is that he made an attempt to commit rape with a deaf and dumb girl.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. There is dispute between the parties over pathway and for this reason, the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Though there is allegation of sexual assault upon the daughter of the informant, but the allegation is not supported by any corroborative evidence. The petitioner is in custody since 23.11.2025 and is having clean antecedent. The charge sheet has been submitted.
7. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner. The learned APP submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner for making an attempt for committing rape with the daughter of the informant.
8. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner and his clean antecedent as well as submission of charge sheet against him, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34838 of 2026(5) dt.21-07-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Nawada/court concerned, in connection with Meskaur P.S. Case No. 228/2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.
(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T