Nawal Kishore Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.615 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Nawal Kishore Pandey son of Raghubir Pandey resident of village - P.O. - Katian, P.S. - Bihia and District - Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.
3. Joint Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.
4. Deputy Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.
5. Special Officer, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna.
6. Executive Engineer-cum-Member Secretary, District Water and Clean Samiti, Bihar, Patna.
7. Executive Engineer, Public Health Commissionary, Sheohar.
8. Director, C.C.D.-u, Bihar State Water and Clean Mission, Public Health Engineering Department, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Premises, Bailey Road, Patna - 8000215.
9. Director, P.M.O., Health Engineering Department, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Premises, Bailey Road, Patna - 8000215.
10. Chief Engineer (Citizen) Bihar State Water and Clean Mission, Public Health Engineering Department, Vishweshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
11. D.G.M. NICSI Project Office, 3rd Floor, Technology Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mohammed Abu Haidar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Smt.Namrata Mishra-Ga6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-01-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in case, the petitioner files a representation regarding his grievance, the respondent no. 8 may be directed to dispose of the same within a specified time.
Accordingly, I direct that the petitioner may file a representation before the respondent no. 8 within four weeks from
Patna High Court CWJC No.615 of 2017 (2) dt.29-01-2018 2/2 today and the respondent no. 8 shall pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks thereafter. It is made clear that the Court has expressed no opinion on the merits of the case.
The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U