Satyanarayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45593 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2020 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== SATYANARAYAN YADAV S/o LATE REBU YADAV R/o VILLAGEBINDI, P.S. AND DISTRICT-BANKA. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Md. Nurul Hoda, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Jagdhar Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-04-2022 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within stipulated period, office will place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 379, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegedly, a quarrel took place because of a dispute over a plot of land over which there is competing claim of the parties and in due course it is alleged that for demand of Rangadari, the petitioner and other accused persons assaulted the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to the admitted land
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45593 of 2021(2) dt.18-04-2022 2/2 dispute between the parties. The parties are agnates and no any demand of 'rangdari' has been made. The allegation leveled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Similarly situated co-accused namely Nandeo Yadav, Wakil Yadav, Budhu Yadav and Govind Yadav have been granted anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No.338 of 2021, passed on 24.06.2021. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Banka P.S. Case No.48/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T