Dropati Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34929 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2019 Thana- MEDNI CHAUKI District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1.

DROPATI DEVI Wife of Teni Rajak Resident of Village- Kirenpur, P.S.- Mednichouk, District- Lakhisarai.

2.

Teni Rajak Son of Biso Rajak Resident of Village- Kirenpur, P.S.- Mednichouk, District- Lakhisarai.

3.

Babita Kumari Daughter of Teni Rajak Resident of Village- Kirenpur, P.S.- Mednichouk, District- Lakhisarai.

4.

Bhola Yadav @ Sonu Kumar Son of Supo Yadav Resident of VillageKirenpur, P.S.- Mednichouk, District- Lakhisarai. 5.

Kathma Mandal @ Kathya Mandal @ Rakesh Kumar Son of Uday Mandal Resident of Village- Kirenpur, P.S.- Mednichouk, District- Lakhisarai. 6.

Koshal Kumar @ Kaushal Kumar Son of Teni Rajak Resident of VillageKirenpur, P.S.- Mednichouk, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Medni Chouki P.S. Case No. 20/19, disclosing offences under Sections 366 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that they have falsely been implicated in this case and have been made accused only because, they happen to be the father,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34929 of 2019(3) dt.07-08-2019 2/2 mother and other family members of co-accused, who alleged to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant and the real fact is that there was love affair between the son of petitioner no. 1 and the daughter of informant and they have also solemnized the marriage, which will appear from the statement of the girl recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., in which, she has stated that she had gone with the son of petitioner no. 1 out of her own will and married with him.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai, in connection with Medni Chouki P.S. Case No. 20/19, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T