← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/3465/2016disposed

Parmeshwar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through Shri Deepak Kumar, District Magistrate, Saran At Chapra And ANR

2017-02-22Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3465 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6669 of 2011 ====================================================== Parmeshwar Singh, Son of Late Ram Audan Singh, Resident of VillagePaterhi Baiji, PO Ishrauli, PS Marhaura, District Saran at Chapra, retired Assistant Teacher, Middle School, Padmoul, Circle Mashrakh, District Saran at Chapra.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Shri Deepak Kumar, S/o not known to the petitioner, District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

2. Shri Amar Bhushan, S/o not known to the petitioner, presently posted as the District Program Officer (Establishment), Saran at Chapra. .... .... opposite party /s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar Manglam For the opposite party/s : Mr. Kumar Alok SC 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-02-2017 Heard Sri Shashi Bhushan Kumar Manglam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kumar Alok, learned SC No. 7. The present petition has been filed on an allegation of willful disobedience to an order passed by this Court in CWJC No. 6669 of 2011. By the said order writ petition on the objection raised by the State Counsel that without demanding justice the petitioner had directly approached the writ court, the writ petition was disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the Respondent No. 3 and thereafter direction was given to consider the representation and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a prescribed

Patna High Court MJC No.3465 of 2016 (4) dt.22-02-2017 2/2 time.

In this case a show cause has been filed on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 and along with the show cause an order passed by the District Magistrate has been brought on record as Annexure- 'A' . It was submitted by Sri Kumar Alok that in compliance with the order of the writ court a detailed reasoned order was passed, of-course some delay has occurred, but that was not intentional , but same was procedural. In view of the fact that in compliance of the order of the writ court reasoned order has been passed , there is no reason to keep the matter pending.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U