← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20099/2016consigned

Subhash Chandra Mishra v. Lalit Narain Mithila University And ORS

2017-12-20Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20099 of 2016 ====================================================== Subhash Chandra Mishra, Son of Late Harsh Narayan Mishra, resident of Village Umari, P.S. Lakhnaur, District - Madhubani at present working as Lab-Incharge, Department of Physics, Harshpati Singh College, Madhepur, P.S. Madhepur, District - Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Lalit Narain Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga through its Registrar.

2. Vice Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga District - Darbhanga.

3. The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Kameshwar Nagar, Darbhanga, District - Darbhanga.

4. The Principal Harshpati Singh College, Dharmanand Nagar, Madhepur, District - Madhubani.

5. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary (Higher Education), Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 20-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The matter has been listed on the motion slip filed by learned counsel for the petitioner pointing out some typographical errors in the order dated 14.12.2017, by which the writ petition has been disposed off.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that at various places in the order the reference relating to the case of Binod Kumar Jha & Ors. vs. State of Bihar and Ors. dated 26.08.2004, the case number has been mentioned as 'C.W.J.C.

Patna High Court CWJC No.20099 of 2016 (4) dt.20-12-2017 2/2 No. 9215 of 1998', which is factually incorrect as the correct number is 'C.W.J.C. No. 9215 of 1999'.

4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner appears to be correct which is also not disputed by learned counsel for the respondents.

5. Accordingly, reference to 'C.W.J.C. No. 9215 of 1998' in the order dated 14.12.2017 be read as 'C.W.J.C. No. 9215 of 1999'.

6.

The order dated 14.12.2017 stands modified/corrected to the extent indicated above. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U