← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3945/2021disposed

Deo Bilas Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2021-11-22Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3945 of 2021 ====================================================== Deo Bilas Singh S/o Late Lal Kishun Singh resident of vill.- Aiyara, P.s.- Karpi, District- Arwal, At present residing at House N. 6, Parnami Path, Gandhi Nagar, West Boring Canal Road, P.s.- SK. Puri, Patna-800001, Town and District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 2.

The Secretary, Education Department, Vikash Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 3.

The Director cum Joint Commissioner, Directorate General Provident Fund, Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna 4.

District Magistrate, Patna 5.

The District Provident Fund Officer, Patna 6.

The District Programme Officer, District- Patna 7.

The District Programme Officer, Nalanda 8.

The District Programme Officer (Establishment) District- Patna 9.

The Treasury Officer, Patna 10.

The Head Master, Damodar High School Raghunathpur, Paliganj, DistrictPatna 11.

The Head Master, High School, Telhara (Nalanda) District- Nalanda ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Prakritita Sharma, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, AC to GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-11-2021 Heard Ms. Prakritita Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, learned AC to GP-23 for the State.

The petitioner, who retired in the year 2004 from the post of Assistant teacher, has filed the present writ application claiming interest @ 12.5 per cent, 11 per cent, 9.5 per cent and

Patna High Court CWJC No.3945 of 2021(4) dt.22-11-2021 2/3 8 per cent respectively with effect from July, 1985 till the date of retirement i.e. 29.2.2004.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after calculating the interest at different rate for the different period, a detailed chart of deductions of GPF as well as interest thereon be provided to the petitioner by the Respondent No. 5 i.e. the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that the rate of interest applicable for different period upon the GPF amount was paid to the petitioner regularly and the entire amount towards the GPF was paid to the petitioner on 15.9.2004 with interest. He further submits that after delay of about 16 years, the petitioner has filed the present writ application seeking details of deductions of GPF and interest paid thereupon.

After having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the statement made in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the counter affidavit, the petitioner is permitted to file a fresh representation before the District Provident Fund Officer, Patna (Respondent No. 5) raising his grievance and if such a representation is filed, the same shall be disposed by the District Provident Fund Officer Patna, in accordance with law as early

Patna High Court CWJC No.3945 of 2021(4) dt.22-11-2021 3/3 as possible.

With aforesaid observation and direction, this writ application is accordingly disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J) S.Ali/- U