Md. Tahseen Equabal @ Tahseen Equabal @ Md. Tahsin v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Appeal (DB) No.103 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -61 Year- 2012 Thana -RUDRAPUR District- MADHUBANI ======================================================
1. Md. Tahseen Equbal, Son of Md. Abdul Jabbar, Resident of VillageHarna, Police Station- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani. .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sajjad Sidiki, Son of Abdul Sattar,
3. Sahnawaj Sidiki, Son of Abdul Sattar,
4. Akbar Ali, Son of Md. Majlum,
5. Rashid, Son of Atikur Rahman,
6. Md. Obais, Son of Jabeer Alam, All are resident of Village- Harana, P.S.- Rudrapur, District- Madhubani.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA) 19-06-2018 Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State on the point of admission.
This Criminal Appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 13.10.2017 passed in Session Trial no. 129 of 2013, 402/14 and 158/14 by which and whereunder the learned court below acquitted the respondent nos. 2 to 6 of the charges whereas convicted 14 accused persons.
Patna High Court CR. APP (DB) No.103 of 2018 (6) dt.19-06-2018 2/2 Submission on behalf of the appellant is that the learned court below acquitted the respondent nos. 2 to 6 without any reason, particularly, in the circumstance when there was sufficient evidence to convict the respondent no. 2 to 6. From perusal of the impugned judgment, we find that the learned court below well discussed the evidences on record and passed the impugned judgment of acquittal in respect of the respondent nos. 2 to 6. We do not find any ground to interfere into the impugned judgment of acquittal because the impugned judgment of acquittal does not carry any perversity and illegality. Accordingly, this Criminal Appeal stands dismissed on admission stage itself.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) N.K/- U