Patna High CourtMJC/2949/2016disposed

Mostt. Jamun Devi @ Jamuna Devi And ANR v. The Union Of India Through Ministry Of Home Affairs, South Block, New Delhi And ORS

2018-01-19The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2949 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21044 of 2011 ===========================================================

1. Mostt. Jamun Devi @ Jamuna Devi wives of Late Bhular Mishra Resident of Village- Rasiary, Police Station- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga.

2. Mostt. Puna Devi wives of Late Bhular Mishra Resident of Village- Rasiary, Police Station- Ghanshyampur, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India Through Ministry of Home Affairs, South Block, New Delhi.

2. The State of Bihar.

3. Mr. Amir Sohani, The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Chandra Shekhar Kumar, The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

5. Mr. Alok Kumar, The Deputy Collector, General Administration, Darbhanga.

6. Mr. Rampadarath Rai, The Treasury Officer, Darbhanga.

7. Mr. Safique, The Sub-Divisional Officer, Biraul, Darbhanga.

8. Mr Devanand Singh Kuwar, The Block Development Officer, Kiratpur, Darbhanga.

.... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha, Advocate For Union of India : Ms. Chhaya Mishra (C.G.C.) =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 19-01-2018 Keeping in view the nature of order passed by the learned Writ Court, which was an innocuous order granting liberty to the petitioner to raise the claim and a direction to the respondents to consider and take a decision on the same, now in view of the order passed by the respondents as indicated in Annexure A to the show cause deciding the claim of the petitioner, no indulgence is called for

Patna High Court MJC No.2949 of 2016 dt.19-01-2018 2/2 in the matter.

In case the petitioner has any grievance still subsisting, he shall have the liberty to challenge it afresh in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, the application is disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date24-01-2018 Transmission Date