← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4107/2018disposed

Mithileshwar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-09-25Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4107 of 2018 ====================================================== Mithileshwar Sharma S/o Late Rameshwar Singh R/o Village Rukunpura, P.S. Khiri More, District Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Engineer-in-Chief, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad. 6.

The Executive Engineer, Daudnagar Division, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kunal Tiwary, AC to GA 2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-09-2023 On call, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner although Mr. Kunal Tiwary, learned A.C. to G.A. 2 is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for issuance of directions to the respondent authorities to pay all consequential benefits on the basis of the 1st ACP in the payscale of Rs. 5000-8000 and 2nd ACP in the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 including its revision and statutory interest in the light of the letter no. 794 dated 14.12.2009, issued by the Water Resources Department to the petitioner who is eligible for the same.

3. Learned State Counsel has taken this Court to

Patna High Court CWJC No.4107 of 2018(3) dt.25-09-2023 2/2 paragraph nos. 7 to 9 as also Annexure A and B dated 18.07.2018 and 26.07.2018 issued by the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad and the Executive Engineer, Daudnagar Division, Water Resources Department, Aurangabad respectively.

4. From the aforesaid facts/annexures, it is clear that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.

5. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U