← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45342/2021bail rejected

Dibyanshu Jha @ Soni Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2022-01-05Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45342 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-755 Year-2020 Thana- KAHALGAON District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Dibyanshu Jha @ Soni Jha Son of Late Kapileshwar Jha Resident of Village - Nadiya Tola, P.S. Kahalgaon, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.T. No. 148 of 2021 (arising out of Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 755 of 2020) instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 353, 332 and 333 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1-aa)(b) and 26 of the Arms Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Bihar Explosive Substances Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.12.2020 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that they went to raid the premises where they had secret information that criminals were hiding and on seeing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45342 of 2021(2) dt.05-01-2022 2/2 the police force, the petitioner started to throw bomb on the police party on account of which several policemen were injured.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner is a veteran criminal having criminal antecedents of more than nine cases as mentioned in paragraph '3' of the bail application and further that there is an allegation of throwing bomb on policemen leading to injuries to them who had gone to apprehend the criminals.

In view of the submissions made by the learned A.P.P. for the State, the Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is thus rejected. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T