Meera Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13903 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Meera Kumari wife of Late Vijay Kumar Jha Resident of Village - Manika, PO - Akhtiyarpur, Block - Sarairanjan, District - Samastipur, presently posted as Assistant Teacher, Primary School Khetapur, Dharmpur, District - Samastipur .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

4. The District Education Officer, Samastipur.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Samastipur.

6. The Block Education Officer, Sarairanjan, District - Samastipur.

7. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Dharampur, Sarairanjan in the District of Samastipur .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP XXIII ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 05-02-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the State.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the claim of the petitioner was considered by the District Appellate Authority (Teachers' Appointment), Samastipur, and vide order (Memo No. 11), contained in Annexure 7, dated 09.01.2015 the Appeal No. 50 of 2013 was disposed of, but, unfortunately the consequential benefit arising out of decision of the appellate authority, contained in Annexure 7, has not been provided to the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has already represented the Principal Secretary, Department of

Patna High Court CWJC No.13903 of 2016 (2) dt.05-02-2018 2/2 Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, for redressal of his grievance vide Annexure 10 and the matter is still pending since 23.02.2016.

In view of the above, there is no point to keep the writ petition pending which was filed way-back on 20th August, 2016, and also in view of the fact that two advance copies of the writ petition have been served in the office of the Advocate General for facilitating to file the counter affidavit, which has not yet been filed, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to to the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, to take final decision on the representation filed by the petitioner, contained in Annexure 10, dated 23.02.2016, and ensure the consequential benefit, if any, admissible to the petitioner within a maximum period of three months, from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) SA/- U