Sushil Kumar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36266 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-384 Year-2020 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Sushil Kumar Mahto Son Of Dinanath Mahto Resident Of Village- Purana Haripur, P.S.- Koilwar, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through video conferencing.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Koilwar PS Case No. 384 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail is not maintainable in view of the Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav Vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) PLJR 1089. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T