← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9507/2022dismissed

Khushbu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2023-04-27Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9507 of 2022 ====================================================== Khushbu Kumari W/o Ram Kumar Rai, Resident of Village - Bagaul, P.S. - Babubarhi, District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The District Magistrate Cum Collector, Madhubani. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

4.

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The Anchaladhikari, Circle Office, Babubarhi, District - Madhubani. 6.

The Officer, Incharge, Babubarhi, Police Station, District - Madhubani. 7.

Ravindra Kumar Thakur, Son of Late Phuleshwar Thakur, resident of Village - Pirhi, P.S. - Babubarhi, District- Madhubani. 8.

Raushan Kumar Thakur, Son of Late Phuleshwar Thakur, resident of Village - Pirhi, P.S. - Babubarhi, District- Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (SC 8) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-04-2023 The present petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs :- " (i) For a direction to the Respondents to make payment of 1/3 share of all the retiral dues of Late Phuleshwar Thakur, the father of this petitioner, who had expired during service tenure from the post of Dafadar at Babubarhi Police Station, leaving behind him two sons and a daughter (this petitioner).

(ii) For a further direction to the Respondents to get the money returned back,

Patna High Court CWJC No.9507 of 2022(2) dt.27-04-2023 2/2 if the same has been illegally paid to the Respondent No. 8 under the connivance of officials of Circle Office, Babubarhi and to be paid to this petitioner to the extent of her share.

(iii) For taking stern action against the Respondents for swearing false affidavit in order to receive the retiral dues of the father of this petitioner, for which she was equally entitled as of her brother."

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies, as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U