Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34756/2020bail rejected

Ranjesh Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2021-06-25Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34756 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-212 Year-2020 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur ====================================================== RANJESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY S/o Mani Kant Choudhary R/VKhamhar, P.S.- Bibhutipur, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate.

For the State :

Dr. Indiwar Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State, through Video Conferencing. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dalsingsarai P.S. Case No.212 of 2020 registered under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Dalsingsarai, Samastipur.

The accusation is that the petitioner being the clerk in the State Bank of India, Dalsingsarai Branch, withdrew Rs.2,82,000/- from the House Loan Account No.11459331531 of Manikant Chaudhary in between 06.07.2019 to 17.09.2019 and also transferred the Fixed Deposit Amount of Dewan Jha, who died on 19.11.2010, in different accounts.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34756 of 2020(3) dt.25-06-2021 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it has come in the F.I.R. and also in the statement of the Chief Manager, State Bank of India, Dalsingsarai Branch, that withdrawn amount of Rs.18,41,800/- has already been recovered.

Having considered the facts and the circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court within four weeks from today and pray for regular bail, which shall be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U