← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18415/2016disposed

Ashok Verma v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-01-19Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18415 of 2016 ====================================================== Ashok Verma Son of Late M.P. Verma, resident of Indu Niketan opposite Lalita Hotel, Boring Canal Road, Patna - 800023, P.O. - Shastri Nagar, Patna, Police Station - S.K. Puri, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Provident Fund Directorate, Finance Department, Pant Bhawan, Patna.

5. The Collector, Begusarai.

6. The District Magistrate-cum-Settlement Officer, Begusarai.

7. The District Provident Fund Officer, District - Begusarai.

8. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, A.A.G. 12 Mr. Majid Habibulla, A.C. to A.A.G.

For the Accountant General :

Mr. Anjani Kumar Sharan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AAG-12 for the State and learned counsel for the Accountant General.

2. In view of the pleadings on record, the grievance of the petitioner appears to have been redressed.

3. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the actual payments have not been made. If the

Patna High Court CWJC No.18415 of 2016 (7) dt.19-01-2018 2/2 same is correct, direction is issued to the Accountant General to ensure that authority in terms of the sanction order is issued in favour of the petitioner within one week and similarly, the respondent no. 7 is directed to ensure that actual payment of G.P.F. is credited into the account of the petitioner, if already not done, within one week from the date of production of a copy of this order before him.

4. The writ petition stands disposed off in the aforementioned terms.

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U