Raushan Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41127 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-235 Year-2025 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== Raushan Kumar Jha S/O Lalan Jha Resident of Village - Pachadhi, Police Station - Pandaul, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md Soban Asghar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with G.R. No.2591 of 2025 arising out of Pandaul P.S. Case No.235 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4) & 310(5) of the BNS and under Sections 25(1B)(a), 26 & 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police had information that certain miscreants have gathered and they are planning to commit dacoity. On this information, the place was searched and three persons were apprehended. It is alleged that the petitioner managed to escape.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41127 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 committed no offence. It has further been submitted that save and except police information, there is nothing against the petitioner. It has been submitted that the petitioner was not apprehended from the place of occurrence rather his name was disclosed by the apprehended persons. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 12.10.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. It has been submitted that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned C.J.M., Madhubani in connection with G.R. No.2591 of 2025 arising out of Pandaul P.S. Case No.235 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T