Daya Nand Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46230 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2021 Thana- ROSERA District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Daya Nand Mahto, Son Of Late Laxmi Mahto Resident Of Village - Rasalpur Milki, P.S. - Rahuaa, Distt. - Samastipur. 2.

Kedar Mahto Son Of Late Laxmi Mahto Resident Of Village - Rasalpur Milki, P.S. - Rahuaa, Distt. - Samastipur.

3.

Vashant Mahto @ Vasant Kumar Son Of Daya Nand Mahto Resident Of Village - Rasalpur Milki, P.S. - Rahuaa, Distt. - Samastipur. 4.

Nitish Mahto @ Nitish Kumar Son Of Kedar Mahto Resident Of Village - Rasalpur Milki, P.S. - Rahuaa, Distt. - Samastipur. 5.

Chandan Mahto @ Chandan Kumar Son Of Kedar Mahto Resident Of Village - Rasalpur Milki, P.S. - Rahuaa, Distt. - Samastipur. 6.

Pankaj Mahto @ Pankaj Kumar Son Of Dayanand Mahto Resident Of Village - Rasalpur Milki, P.S. - Rahuaa, Distt. - Samastipur. 7.

Lal Babu Jha Son Of Ram Sakal Jha Resident Of Village - Rajwara, P.S. - Khanpur, Distt. - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Vijay Mahto Son Of Late Laxmi Mahto Resident Of Village - Rasalpur Milki, Ward No. 01, Rahua, P.S. - Rosera, Distt. - Samastipur. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar No1 For the State :

Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay- A.P.P.

For Opposite Party :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha Mr.Shishir Kumar Shishir ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-01-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, at the outset, submits that the police after investigation has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46230 of 2021(3) dt.31-01-2024 2/2 submitted charge-sheet and in pursuance whereof, cognizance has been taken.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners thus seeks permission to withdraw the present quashing application with a liberty to the petitioners to assail the order of cognizance.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T