← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3724/2021dismissed

Santosh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,

2022-01-20Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad,Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 3724 of 2021 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar Singh son of Mukhram Singh proprietor of Maa Mundeshwari Mini Rice Mill, resident of village Baradhi, P.S. Chand, District Kaimur at Bhabhua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and consumer Protection Department, Patna, Bihar at Patna. 2.

Food and Consumer Protection Department through its the Principal Secretary, Bihar at Patna.

3.

Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation through its Managing Director, Office at Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Prasad Path, R- Block, Road No. 2, Patna- 800001.

4.

Managing Director, The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation office at Khadya Bhawan, Daroga Prasad Path, R-Block, Road No. 2, Patna800001. 5.

District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Kaimur, District- Kaimur. 6.

District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation, DistrictKaimur. 7.

The District Certificate Officer, Kaimur, District- Kaimur. 8.

The Officer In-Charge, Chand, P.S. - Chand, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua). ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr Sumeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr Nikhil Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 20-01-2022 This case has been taken up for online hearing through video-conference because of COVID 19 pandemic restrictions.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that this writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.3724 of 2021(2) dt.20-01-2022 2/2 application has become infructuous in view of the fact that no auction has taken place on the basis of auction notice, which has been put to challenge in the present writ application. This application stands dismissed, as having become infructuous.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) (Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U