Patna High CourtCWJC/7499/2014dismissed

Brajesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-01-23Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7499 of 2014 =========================================================== Brajesh Kumar Singh S/o Ganesh Prasad Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Banama, P.S. Shahkund, P.O. Punchrukhi, District - Bhagalpur, Bihar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna

3. The Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman, Bailey Road, Patna

4. The Secretary, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bailey Road, Patna

5. The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna

6. The Principal Secretary, Finance, ( Commercial Tax ) Main Secretariat, Patna

7. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Main ( Old ) Secretariat, Patna

8. The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Main Secretariat, Patna, Bihar

9. Bipin Kumar S/o Binay Kumar Biswas, Resident of Village - Kharhat, P.O. Narayanpur, P.S. Raniganj, District - Araria

10. Suraj Kumar Singh S/o Late Badrinath Singh, Resident of Mohalla + P.S. Baliya, District - Baliya ( Uttar Pradesh ) .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abul Kalam For the Respondent No. 1, 5 to 7: Mr. Pawan Kumar, AC to GA-9 For the Respondent No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Satyabir Bharti =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-01-2015 Heard the parties.

In view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court by its order dated 15th January, 1998 passed in Civil Appeal No. 3497 of 1988 (Bihar Public Service Commission vs. Pandey Venktesh Prasad Sinha & Anr.) (Annexure-A to the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent No. 2 to 4) resolving the issues conclusively, which have been raised in the present proceeding, the present writ petition has to fail and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U