Anil Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15479 of 2016 =========================================================== Anil Singh, Son of Madheshwar Singh, Resident of Village- Kanaudi, P.S.- Gurua, Dist.- Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Secretary Land Reforms.
2. The District Magistrate, Gaya.
3. The Sub- Divisional Officer, Sherghati, Gaya.
4. The Circle Officer, Gurua.
.... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : M/s. Alok Kumar Choudhary, Kulanand Jha, Nagendra Kumar, Advocates For the State : MD. Naseem Mukhtar, A.C. to AAG12 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 03-10-2016 Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Choudhary, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Md. Naseem Mukhtar, learned Assistant Counsel to learned Additional Advocate General No.12, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents. The grievance of the writ petitioner, in this writ petition, made under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Public Interest Litigation, relates to removal of encroachment from survey Plot Nos. 193 and 196, Thana No.632, Thana- Gurua, District - Gaya, which is used as Aam Rasta.
Having regard to the facts pleaded in this writ petition, the materials on record and, having heard learned Counsel for both the
Patna High Court CWJC No.15479 of 2016 dt.03-10-2016 2/2 parties, we find that the subject matter of this writ petition is fully covered by the observations made, and the directions given, by us in the order, dated 24.11.2015, passed in C.W.J.C. No.4309 of 2015 (Sanjay Jha Vs. The State of Bihar and Others), reported in 2016(1) PLJR 248.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that respondent No.2, namely, the Collector, Gaya, shall act, in the present matter, in accordance with law, keeping in view the observations made and the directions given in the order, dated 24.11.2015, aforementioned.
The petitioner may furnish to respondent No.2, namely, District Magistrate, Gaya, a copy of this writ petition along with annexures thereto and also a certified copy of this order. In view of the above, this writ petition is accordingly, disposed of.
Let a copy of this order be sent by FAX to the Collector, Gaya.
(I. A. Ansari, CJ) (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.10.2016 Transmission Date Spd/-/ Sanjay NA