Chote Lal Deo @ Virendra Lal Deo @ Chhote Lal Deo v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36955 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-171 Year-2021 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== 1.
Chote Lal Deo @ Virendra Lal Deo @ Chhote Lal Deo Son Of Jamadar Lal Deo Resident Of Village- Panta, P.S.- Sadar (SONKI O.P), DistrictDarbhanga 2.
Anil Lal Deo @ Alit Lal Deo Son Of Rajbali Lal Deo Resident Of VillagePanta, P.S.- Sadar (SONKI O.P), District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Manish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Satya Nand Shukla ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-11-2022 Heard Mr. Rajesh Singh, learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of nonremoval of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioners along with others co-accused is said to have assaulted the informant and his family members. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36955 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners. He submits that similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.10.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21984 of 2022. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that there is no specific overt act against the petitioners, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sadar (Sonki O.P) P.S. Case No. 171/2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) ajay/- U T