Patna High CourtCR. MISC./39594/2024dismissed

Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-10Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39594 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2020 Thana- JAMUI District- Jamui ====================================================== Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar Son of Bharat Yadav Resident of Village - Taradih (Dundo), Police Station - Jamui, District - Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anzarul Haque Sahara ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Jamui P.S. Case No. 434 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant by means of iron rod.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that in the impugned order it is mentioned that no independent

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39594 of 2024(2) dt.10-07-2024 2/2 witnesses have supported the prosecution case. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that the injury found upon the informant was grievous in nature.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order on the same day in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U