← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./47466/2021bail granted

Saroj Kumari @ Saroj Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-24Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47466 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-489 Year-2020 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== SAROJ KUMARI @ SAROJ DEVI Wife of - Vijay Kumar Resident of Village- Pandit Bigha, P.S.- Sherghati, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Braj Kishore Singh Mr. Kishore Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar III APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 489 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 196,197, 198, 199 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, petitioner belongs to B.C category and she appeared in Teachers eligibility Test ( BTET). The allegation of manipulation of marks in the BTET records . Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has obtained 82 marks in paper-I and 93 marks in Paper-II, which shown having qualified. From perusal of the impugned order it

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47466 of 2021(2) dt.24-03-2022 2/2 appears that the allegation against the petitioner is that she got Panchayat teacher job by using fake BETET certificate. She has tempered in category and serial no of her original marks sheet. It is further submits that petitioner has no role of publication of mark sheet and change in her description as indicated by her with supporting certificates. Petitioner has clean antecedent. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail prayer of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstance of the case as well as submission of the parties, let the petitioner in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court Below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Barachatti ( Mohanpur) P.S Case No. 489 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) N.K/- U