Raj Kumari Bharti @ Raj Kumari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36807 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-228 Year-2022 Thana- MUFFASIL PURNIA District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.

RAJ KUMARI BHARTI @ RAJ KUMARI DEVI WIFE OF BHIM YADAV @ RAJESH YADAV R/O- VILL- PIPRA, WARD NO. 6, P.S.-MUSFFASIL, DIST.- PURNEA 2.

SANTOSH YADAV @ SANTOSH KUMAR YADAV SON OF LATE SURYA NARAYAN YADAV R/O- VILL- PIPRA, WARD NO. 6, P.S.- MUSFFASIL, DIST.- PURNEA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, seeks permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.2 as he has been arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail application. Permission is accorded.

The petitioner no.1 apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a woman, she has got antecedent of two cases and both the cases were instituted from the side of the present

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.36807 of 2022(2) dt.11-08-2022 2/2 informant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. it would manifest that on account of land dispute, the present occurrence took place in which it is alleged that the petitioner was an order giver and in the occurrence, people from the side of the informant were assaulted by the named accused persons as detailed in the F.I.R. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner no.1, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 228 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T