Saryu Prasad Sharma @ Saraju Prasad Sharma v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14338 of 2021 ====================================================== Saryu Prasad Sharma @ Saraju Prasad Sharma Son of Lahari Sharma Resident of Village and P.O. Chhewari, P.S. Ramgarh, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Kaimur (Bhabua).

4.

The Sub- Divisional Officer, Mohania, Kaimur. 5.

The Block Supply Officer, Ramgarh, Kaimur.

6.

The Block Development Officer, Ramgarh, Kaimur. 7.

The Circle Officer, Ramgarh, Kaimur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gaurav Govind, Adv For the Respondent/s :

Mr. V.P. Singh, AC to SC-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 15-12-2021 The petitioner's licence to run a PDS shop under Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 [hereinafter referred to as BTPDS (Control) Order], has been cancelled by an order dated 26.04.2020 which the petitioner has assailed in the present writ application. His appeal has also been dismissed by the District Magistrate, Kaimur-cum-Appellate Authority by an order dated 18.03.2021, which is also under-

Patna High Court CWJC No.14338 of 2021(6) dt.15-12-2021 2/2 challenged in this application.

This is an admitted position that BTPDS (Control) Order provides for revision against the order of the Appellate Authority which the petitioner has not availed. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to prefer revision petition before the Revisional Authority.

Considering the facts and circumstances, this application is permitted to be withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly with a liberty to the petitioner to prefer revision petition before the appropriate Authority.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U