Munna Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35013 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2024 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Munna Kumar S/o- Yogendra Manjhi Resident of Village- Hansrajpur Kalan, P.S.- Baniyapur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case no.17 of 2024 registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that while he was going on his motorcycle, he was intercepted by four accused persons on two motorcycles and looted of his mobile phone, cash to the tune of Rs.4,000/ besides other articles as mentioned in the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation in the confessional statement of co-accused Sandeep Kumar. It is submitted that the material that has transpired against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35013 of 2025(2) dt.09-06-2025 2/2 petitioner has been dealt with in the order of the learned trial Court from which it would transpire that no material has come to connect the petitioner with the alleged crime. It is submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession and inspite of his being in custody since 25.1.2025, he was not put on T.I. parade and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. The cause of false implication of the petitioner is his antecedent.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner being in custody since 25.1.2025 and chargesheet having been submitted in the case without putting the petitioner on T.I. parade, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case no.17 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saran at Chapra.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T