Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35579 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2024 Thana- BANIAPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar @ Sandip Kumar S/o- Ajay Ram Resident of VillageBhatkeshri, P.S.- Jalalpur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhijeet Abhigyan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 12-06-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case no.17 of 2024 registered under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant was proceeding on his motorcycle, four accused persons looted him of his belongings including mobile phone, cash to the tune of Rs.4,000/ and his motorcycle and fled away.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was registered against unknown. The petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation. It is submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35579 of 2025(2) dt.12-06-2025 2/3 that the material that has transpired in course of investigation has been dealt with in detail in the order of the learned trial Court. The prosecution in course of investigation is mainly relying on the confessional statement of the petitioner made before police which is not admissible. No incriminating article has been recovered from the petitioner's possession and inspite of being in custody since 6.3.2025, the petitioner has not been put on T.I. parade and chargesheet has been submitted in the case. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case because of his antecedents.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation as is evident from the order of the learned trial Court, no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner's possession and the petitioner not having been put on T.I. parade inspite of being in custody since 6.3.2025 together with chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Baniyapur P.S. Case no.17 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35579 of 2025(2) dt.12-06-2025 3/3 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Saran at Chapra. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T